Alcl3: Ionic Or Covalent? Properties & Bonds

Aluminum trichloride, commonly known as AlCl3, exists as a chemical compound. Chemical bonds, specifically ionic and covalent bonds, dictate the properties of molecules. Ionic bonds often result in high melting points. Covalent bonds, in contrast, share electrons between atoms. Determining if AlCl3 is ionic or covalent requires understanding its structure.

Ever wondered what really holds the world together? No, not love, silly! We’re talking about chemical bonds! These tiny forces are the unsung heroes of the molecular world, dictating everything from the shape of your water bottle to the sizzle of your favorite burger.

At the most fundamental level, we encounter two main types of chemical bonds: ionic and covalent. Imagine ionic bonds as the ultimate opposites-attract scenario where electrons are transferred completely from one atom to another. On the other hand, think of covalent bonds as atoms sharing electrons like friends passing around their favorite video game (sometimes more fairly than others!).

But why should you care about all this bond business? Because knowing whether a compound is held together by an ionic or covalent bond is like having a secret decoder ring for chemistry! It allows you to predict how a substance will behave, how it will react with other substances, and what its properties will be. Will it dissolve in water? Will it conduct electricity? The bond type holds the answer!

So, buckle up, chemistry comrades! We’re about to embark on a thrilling journey to uncover the mysteries of ionic and covalent bonds. Our quest? To understand the key factors that determine which type of bond will form, from the electron-grabbing power of atoms (electronegativity) to the sneaky exceptions that keep chemists on their toes. Let’s dive in and decode the world of chemical bonds together!

Contents

Electronegativity: The Tug-of-War for Electrons

Think of electronegativity as each atom’s desire, its power to snatch up electrons when it’s forming a bond with another atom. It’s like a tug-of-war, with electrons as the rope and the atoms as the players. The stronger the atom’s electronegativity, the harder it pulls on those shared electrons. It’s this unequal pulling that ultimately decides whether we’re dealing with a fairly shared (covalent) bond or a complete electron steal (ionic) situation.

Now, how do we know which atoms are the electron-hungry ones? That’s where the periodic table comes in! Think of the periodic table as a treasure map, revealing where the electronegativity loot is hidden.

Periodic Trends: Your Electronegativity Treasure Map

Generally, electronegativity increases as you move across a period (from left to right) on the periodic table. Picture it like this: as you add more protons to the nucleus of an atom, the positive charge gets stronger, so it can snag those electrons more effectively. So the atoms on the far right (excluding the noble gases) are real electron bandits!

But as you move down a group (from top to bottom), electronegativity decreases. Why? Because as you add more electron shells, the outer electrons get farther and farther from the positively charged nucleus, and the nucleus’s pull becomes weaker, making them less able to attract electrons. The atoms at the top are better at attracting electrons.

So, by understanding these periodic trends, you can predict which atom in a bond is more likely to hog the electrons. This is going to be super useful when determining whether a bond is leaning towards ionic or covalent character. Get ready to put this electronegativity treasure map to good use!

Calculating Electronegativity Difference: A Key Indicator

Okay, so you’ve got two atoms, they’re thinking about hooking up, forming a chemical bond, but how do you know what kind of relationship they’re going to have? Will it be a full-on ionic bond, like a super strong magnet, or a cozy covalent bond where they share everything? That’s where electronegativity difference comes in! Think of it like this: each atom has a certain “electron-grabbing” ability.

So, how do we figure out this electron-grabbing difference? Simple! First, you need to know each atom’s electronegativity value. These values are usually found on a periodic table or in a reference table. Then, you just subtract the smaller electronegativity value from the larger one. That’s it! You’ve got your electronegativity difference!

Now, here’s the juicy part: this difference is a major indicator of what kind of bond is going to form. A big difference? Think ionic bond – a full-on electron transfer is about to happen! A small difference? Get ready for a covalent bond – sharing is caring, after all (well, sort of).

In essence, the magnitude of electronegativity difference tells us about the nature of the impending bond. It’s like a cheat sheet to predict how these atoms will interact, and whether it will be a relationship built on giving and taking, or equal contribution! Remember, it’s all about the electrons and who wants them more!

Ionic vs. Covalent: Decoding the Electronegativity Difference Thresholds

Alright, so you’ve got your atoms, they’re looking to hook up, but how do you know if they’re going to go full-on ionic or just be covalent buddies? That’s where the electronegativity difference comes in, acting like a chemical dating app to predict the kind of relationship these atoms are likely to have. Think of it as the litmus test for chemical bonding!

Ionic Bonds: When Extremes Attract

When you’ve got a big electronegativity difference – generally, we’re talking about a difference greater than 1.7 or even 2.0 (sources vary a little, so keep an eye out!) – you’re heading into ionic territory. This is like that couple where one person is super clingy and the other is just chill, resulting in a complete electron transfer. One atom completely steals an electron from the other, creating ions with opposite charges that are then powerfully attracted to each other. Basically, it’s a chemical mugging followed by intense electrostatic love!

Polar Covalent Bonds: A Little Tug-of-War

Now, when the electronegativity difference is moderate, usually between 0.4 and 1.7 (or 2.0), things get a little more complicated. Here, you’re in polar covalent bond land. The atoms are sharing electrons, but not equally. It’s like sharing a pizza, but one person is always grabbing the bigger slices. This creates a slightly negative charge (δ-) on the more electronegative atom and a slightly positive charge (δ+) on the other. It’s shared, but not fair – that’s polarity for you!

Nonpolar Covalent Bonds: A Harmonious Sharing Agreement

Finally, if the electronegativity difference is tiny or basically nonexistent – like, less than 0.4 – you’ve got yourself a nonpolar covalent bond. This is when the atoms are so alike in their electron-grabbing desires that they share electrons perfectly equally. It’s like splitting the bill evenly on a date; everyone’s happy, there’s no drama, just pure, balanced sharing. Think of molecules like diatomic gases (O2, N2) or hydrocarbons (CH4).

The Cheat Sheet: Electronegativity Difference Table

To make life easier, here’s a handy-dandy table summarizing the electronegativity difference ranges and their corresponding bond types:

Electronegativity Difference Bond Type Analogy
Greater than 1.7 (or 2.0) Ionic Unequal Distribution of income
0.4 to 1.7 (or 2.0) Polar Covalent Sharing a pizza unevenly
Less than 0.4 Nonpolar Covalent Splitting the bill on a date

Ionic Bonds: The Attraction of Opposites

Alright, folks, let’s dive into the world where opposites don’t just attract—they stick together with the force of a thousand suns! We’re talking about ionic bonds, the ultimate “opposites attract” story in chemistry. Forget Romeo and Juliet; this is about sodium and chlorine, a tale for the ages!

So, how do these ionic bonds actually form? Picture this: one atom, let’s say sodium, is feeling generous and decides to donate an electron. That electron goes zooming over to another atom, like chlorine, which is just itching to get its hands on it. This isn’t sharing; it’s a full-blown transfer of power (or, you know, electrons).

The Electrostatic Embrace

Now, here’s where the magic happens. Once sodium loses an electron, it becomes a positively charged ion (a cation). Chlorine, having gained an electron, transforms into a negatively charged ion (an anion). And guess what? These oppositely charged ions are drawn to each other like moths to a flame, creating a powerful electrostatic attraction. It’s like the strongest magnet you’ve ever seen, but on a tiny, atomic scale.

This attraction is so strong that it holds these ions together in a tight, organized structure.

Formula Units vs. Molecules

Here’s a fun fact that might blow your mind: ionic compounds don’t form molecules. Instead, they arrange themselves in a repeating pattern called a crystal lattice. Think of it like a perfectly organized dance floor where the positive and negative ions are locked in an eternal embrace.

So, when we write the formula for an ionic compound like sodium chloride (NaCl), we’re not describing a single molecule. Instead, we’re talking about the simplest ratio of ions in the crystal lattice—a formula unit. It’s like saying, “For every sodium ion, there’s one chlorine ion,” but knowing they’re all part of this giant, interconnected structure.

Covalent Bonds: Sharing is Caring (and Sometimes Not)

Alright, let’s dive into the world of covalent bonds, where atoms decide to share instead of steal, like a group of friends splitting a pizza! Instead of one atom completely yanking electrons away from another (like in ionic bonds), here, they decide to be a bit more… civilized.

Covalent bonds happen when atoms share electrons to achieve a stable electron configuration, usually a full outer shell (think octet rule!). Now, sometimes this sharing is perfectly amicable, like two besties splitting a cookie exactly in half. Other times, it’s more like one sibling sneakily taking a bigger bite than the other! Let’s break it down:

Nonpolar Covalent Bonds: Equal Sharing for the Win!

Imagine two identical twins sharing a toy. Neither has a stronger pull, so they share it equally. That’s basically a nonpolar covalent bond. These bonds occur when atoms with similar electronegativity values get together. Because the electron cloud hangs out evenly between the two atoms, there’s no charge difference across the bond – it’s a symmetrical distribution of charge. Think of molecules like diatomic gases, such as Hydrogen gas (H2) or Oxygen gas (O2). They are the epitome of balanced sharing!

Polar Covalent Bonds: When Sharing Isn’t So Fair

Now, let’s picture a scenario where one atom is a bit greedier than the other. Maybe one sibling really, really wants that toy! That’s a polar covalent bond in action! This happens when atoms with different electronegativities share electrons. The more electronegative atom pulls the shared electrons closer, creating a partial negative charge (δ-). The atom that loses out gets a partial positive charge (δ+). This unequal sharing leads to what we call Bond Polarity. A classic example is Water (H2O). Oxygen is more electronegative than Hydrogen, so the oxygen hogs the electrons, making it partially negative and leaving the hydrogens partially positive. This polarity is what gives water its unique properties, like its ability to dissolve so many different substances.

Properties Speak Volumes: Distinguishing Ionic and Covalent Compounds by Their Characteristics

So, you’ve got your electronegativity differences, you know about electron sharing and stealing, but how does all of this translate into the real world? Well, my friend, buckle up, because the properties of ionic and covalent compounds are totally different, and they’re a dead giveaway as to what’s going on at the atomic level. We’re talking melting points, boiling points, how well they dissolve in stuff (a.k.a. solubility), and whether they can conduct electricity. Let’s dive in and see what makes these compounds tick!

Ionic Compound Properties: The Strong and Stable Type

Think of ionic compounds as the bodybuilders of the chemical world. They’re strong, stable, and really hard to break down, because the bond is that strong electrostatic force that act like an unbreakable magnet.

  • High Melting and Boiling Points: Ever tried melting salt? Didn’t think so. Ionic compounds have crazy high melting and boiling points. This is because those strong electrostatic forces between the positively and negatively charged ions require a ton of energy to overcome. It’s like trying to separate two super-glued magnets – you’ll need some serious heat!
  • Solubility in Polar Solvents: Now, while ionic compounds might not melt easily, they do dissolve quite nicely in polar solvents, like good old water! This is all thanks to ion-dipole interactions. Water molecules are polar (they have a slightly positive and slightly negative end), and these ends are attracted to the charged ions, pulling them away from the crystal lattice.
  • Electrical Conductivity When Dissolved or Molten: Solid ionic compounds don’t conduct electricity because the ions are locked in place. But, dissolve them in water or melt them, and voilà! The ions are now free to move, carrying an electrical charge with them. Think of it like tiny, charged delivery trucks zipping around.

Covalent Compound Properties: The Chill and Adaptable Type

On the other hand, covalent compounds are more like yoga instructors – flexible, adaptable, and generally less intense.

  • Lower Melting and Boiling Points: Covalent compounds have much lower melting and boiling points compared to ionic compounds. This is because the intermolecular forces holding them together are much weaker than the electrostatic forces in ionic compounds. It’s like comparing Velcro to super glue. It can work with light bonds, but it can’t with super strong bonds.
  • Variable Solubility in Different Solvents: Solubility of covalent compounds is a bit more complicated. It all boils down to the saying “like dissolves like.” Polar covalent compounds tend to dissolve in polar solvents, while nonpolar covalent compounds prefer nonpolar solvents.
  • Poor Electrical Conductivity: Covalent compounds generally don’t conduct electricity because they don’t have freely moving charged particles. The electrons are busy being shared, not zipping around like in a metal or ionic solution.

Solubility: Like Dissolves Like

Let’s dig a little deeper into solubility. The “like dissolves like” rule is your best friend here.

  • Polar Solvents: Water is the king of polar solvents, but other examples include alcohol and acetone. Polar solvents are great at dissolving other polar substances, as well as ionic compounds.
  • Nonpolar Solvents: Think of solvents like hexane, toluene, and diethyl ether. These guys are perfect for dissolving nonpolar substances like fats, oils, and waxes.

Basically, if you’re trying to dissolve something, remember to match the polarity of the solvent to the polarity of the solute. It’s like finding the perfect dance partner – you need to be on the same wavelength!

Lewis Structures: Drawing the Electron “Sharing is Caring” Pictures

So, you’ve got the basics of covalent bonds down, right? Atoms sharing electrons like kids with a favorite toy. But how do we visualize this sharing? That’s where Lewis Structures come in. Think of them as little diagrams showing exactly who’s sharing with whom, and how many electrons each atom is bringing to the party.

Imagine drawing dots around each atom to represent its valence electrons (those outer-shell electrons that do all the bonding). Then, you pair them up to show the bonds. Lone pairs? Those are the electrons that aren’t bonding but are just chilling on the atom, adding to the electron cloud. Mastering Lewis Structures is like learning to read the blueprint of a molecule!

Molecular Geometry: Shape Matters!

Okay, we’ve got our Lewis Structures, but molecules aren’t flat drawings on paper. They’re 3D! And their shape, or molecular geometry, has a HUGE impact on their properties. This is where things get interesting!

Think of it this way: the electron pairs around a central atom (both bonding and nonbonding) repel each other. They want to be as far apart as possible. This repulsion dictates the molecule’s shape. Is it linear? Bent? Tetrahedral? Understanding molecular geometry helps us predict how a molecule will interact with other molecules, and whether or not it will be polar. It really is about the shape of the molecules, not the vibe.

Dipole Moment: Quantifying the Pull

If a molecule has polar bonds (remember, unequal sharing of electrons?), and its shape is asymmetrical, then we’ve got a dipole moment. This is basically a measure of how polar the whole molecule is. It’s like a tug-of-war, where one side (the more electronegative atom) is pulling harder on the electrons, creating a partial negative charge on that end and a partial positive charge on the other.

The dipole moment is represented by an arrow pointing from the positive to the negative end. The bigger the arrow, the more polar the molecule. Water (H2O) is a classic example: it’s bent shape and polar O-H bonds give it a significant dipole moment, making it an excellent solvent.

Intermolecular Forces: The Glue That Holds It All Together

Molecules aren’t just floating around in space, minding their own business. They interact with each other through intermolecular forces (IMFs). These are weaker than the covalent bonds within a molecule but are still super important for determining physical properties like boiling point, melting point, and viscosity.

There are different types of IMFs:

  • Van der Waals forces: Weak, temporary attractions between molecules.

  • Dipole-dipole interactions: Attractions between polar molecules.

  • Hydrogen bonding: A particularly strong type of dipole-dipole interaction involving hydrogen bonded to a highly electronegative atom like oxygen or nitrogen.

The stronger the IMFs, the more energy it takes to separate the molecules (i.e., higher boiling point).

Network Covalent Solids: When Sharing Gets Serious

Finally, let’s talk about the rockstars of covalent bonding: network covalent solids. These aren’t your typical molecules held together by IMFs. Instead, they’re giant networks of atoms all covalently bonded to each other, forming a continuous structure.

Think of diamond (carbon atoms bonded in a tetrahedral network) or quartz (silicon and oxygen atoms linked in a complex 3D array). Because breaking all those covalent bonds requires a ton of energy, network covalent solids have extremely high melting points and are incredibly hard. Graphite, another form of carbon, is also a network covalent solid, but its layered structure gives it very different properties (it’s soft and slippery). Network covalent solids aren’t playing around.

Real-World Examples: Putting Theory into Practice

Alright, let’s ditch the textbook for a minute and see how this whole ionic vs. covalent thing plays out in your kitchen, your medicine cabinet, and even in the air you breathe! We’re not just talking about abstract concepts here; we’re talking about the stuff that makes up your world.

  • Ionic Rockstars (and Table Salt!):

    First up, we have ionic heavyweights like sodium chloride (NaCl), or as you probably know it, good old table salt. Think about it – salt crystals are pretty tough, right? You need a grinder to break them down. That’s because those super-strong electrostatic forces we talked about earlier are holding those sodium and chloride ions tightly together. And get this: Magnesium oxide (MgO), the main ingredient in many antacids, is also ionic! Those ionic bonds are what allow it to neutralize stomach acid so effectively. Who knew chemistry could be so soothing to your tummy?

  • Covalent Crew (Water, Methane, and More!):

    Now, let’s swing over to the covalent side of things. Water (H2O), the elixir of life, is a perfect example. Oxygen and hydrogen atoms share electrons to form covalent bonds, and because oxygen is more electronegative than hydrogen, these bonds are polar. This polarity is why water is such a great solvent for many things and why it sticks to itself (think of water beading up on a surface). Then there’s methane (CH4), the main component of natural gas. It’s held together by covalent bonds, which are why it is a gas at room temperature. Carbon dioxide (CO2), which, don’t panic, we all exhale, also has covalent bonds. These bonds, and the molecule’s shape, let it trap heat in the atmosphere.

  • From Properties to Practicality:

    So, what’s the point of all this name-dropping and molecule-gazing? Simple: the type of bond dictates a compound’s properties, and those properties determine how we use it! Ionic compounds are often used where you need high melting points or the ability to conduct electricity when dissolved. Covalent compounds, on the other hand, might be used as insulators or solvents because of their different set of properties. It’s like choosing the right tool for the job, only the tool is a molecule, and the job is anything from flavoring your food to powering your home!

Exceptions to the Rule: When Electronegativity Isn’t Everything

Okay, so we’ve armed ourselves with the power of electronegativity, calculating differences like chemistry superheroes! But, like any good superhero movie, there’s always a plot twist. Electronegativity, while super helpful, isn’t always the ultimate predictor of bond type. Sometimes, things get a little…weird. Think of it as the exception that proves the rule (or at least makes chemistry a lot more interesting!).

Polarization Effects: When Ions Get Squishy

One big reason electronegativity can lead us astray is the wonderful world of polarization effects. Imagine a tiny, highly charged cation (a positive ion) hanging out near a big, bulky anion (a negative ion). The cation, being all small and mighty, can distort the electron cloud of the larger anion, pulling it closer. It’s like the cation is giving the anion a serious electron-cloud makeover.

This distortion creates a shared electron situation that’s more covalent-like than ionic-like, even if the electronegativity difference suggests otherwise. Consider the size difference! Think of it as a tiny chihuahua versus a gentle giant of a St. Bernard. The chihuahua can only pull so much before the St. Bernard barely notices. But sometimes, the chihuahua’s got attitude!

Size Matters (Especially for Anions!)

The size of the ions involved is a major player here. Large anions are more easily polarized because their electrons are further from the nucleus and therefore less tightly held. Small, highly charged cations are more effective at polarizing. Basically, if you have a small, positive ion paired with a big, floppy negative ion, expect some polarization shenanigans!

Specific Examples: Defying Expectations

Let’s look at some real-world examples where electronegativity throws us a curveball:

  • Aluminum Chloride (AlCl3): The electronegativity difference between aluminum and chlorine suggests an ionic bond, and technically at room temperature, Aluminum Chloride does exist in a ionic lattice structure. However, it displays properties more typical of covalent compounds, such as relatively low melting and boiling points. This is due to the aluminum ion’s ability to polarize the chloride ions, leading to significant covalent character in the bonds, but at higher temperatures it becomes an ionic compound. It is known for being very reactive when heated.
  • Lithium Iodide (LiI): Although lithium and iodine have a significant electronegativity difference, LiI has a surprisingly high degree of covalent character. The small size of the lithium ion and the large size of the iodide ion contribute to significant polarization of the iodide ion’s electron cloud.
  • Beryllium Chloride (BeCl2): While the electronegativity difference between beryllium and chlorine might suggest a more ionic character, BeCl2 tends to form polymeric structures with bridging chlorine atoms, a characteristic commonly found in covalent compounds. Beryllium’s small size and relatively high polarizing power lead to electron sharing rather than complete transfer.

These examples highlight that electronegativity is a valuable guide, but we need to consider other factors, such as the sizes of the ions involved and the potential for polarization.

Putting It All Together

So, the takeaway is this: Electronegativity is a fantastic tool in your chemistry toolkit, but it’s not the only tool. By also considering factors like ion size and polarization effects, you’ll be well-equipped to tackle even the trickiest bonding scenarios! Keep those thinking caps on and don’t be afraid to embrace the exceptions—they make chemistry a whole lot more interesting!

What determines the type of bond in Aluminum Iodide (AlI3)?

Electronegativity difference influences bond character. Electronegativity is the measure of an atom’s ability to attract electrons in a chemical bond. A significant electronegativity difference between two atoms generally leads to ionic bond formation. Aluminum has an electronegativity of 1.61, while iodine has an electronegativity of 2.66. The electronegativity difference between aluminum and iodine is 1.05.

Electronegativity difference suggests covalent character. An electronegativity difference between 0.4 and 1.7 often indicates polar covalent bonding. The calculated difference of 1.05 suggests that AlI3 should exhibit polar covalent characteristics. Aluminum’s relatively high electronegativity, compared to typical metals, contributes to this covalent nature. Iodine’s electronegativity is also not high enough to completely strip electrons from aluminum, further supporting covalent behavior.

Polarization effects modify ionic tendencies. Aluminum ion (Al3+) is relatively small and highly charged. This small, highly charged cation has a strong polarizing power. It can distort the electron cloud of the larger iodide ion (I-). This distortion leads to a sharing of electrons, characteristic of covalent bonds.

Experimental evidence supports covalent characteristics. Aluminum iodide exists as a dimer (Al2I6) in the solid state. This dimeric structure indicates covalent bonding. In the gas phase, AlI3 exists as a monomer but still retains significant covalent character. The observed properties, such as relatively low melting and boiling points, align better with covalent compounds than ionic compounds.

How does the size and charge of ions affect the bonding in Aluminum Iodide?

Ionic size impacts polarization effects. Aluminum is a relatively small cation with a high positive charge (Al3+). Iodine is a large anion with a negative charge (I-). The significant size difference between Al3+ and I- enhances polarization.

High charge density leads to covalent character. Aluminum’s small size and +3 charge result in a high charge density. This high charge density strongly attracts the electron cloud of the iodide ion. The attraction causes distortion and increased electron sharing.

Polarization distorts electron clouds. The aluminum ion polarizes the iodide ion. This polarization means the electron cloud of the iodide ion is pulled towards the aluminum. The distortion leads to a concentration of electron density between the two atoms. This concentration is characteristic of covalent bond formation.

Covalent character dominates due to polarization. The polarizing power of Al3+ is sufficient to distort the electron cloud of I- significantly. This distortion results in a substantial degree of electron sharing. The sharing makes the bond more covalent than purely ionic.

What role does the polarizing power of aluminum play in determining the bond type in AlI3?

Polarizing power relates to charge density. Aluminum (Al3+) has a high polarizing power. This power is due to its small size and high positive charge. High charge and small size create a high charge density.

High charge density distorts electron clouds. The high charge density of Al3+ strongly attracts electrons from the iodide ion (I-). This strong attraction distorts the electron cloud surrounding the iodide ion. The distortion results in a shift of electron density towards the aluminum ion.

Distorted electron clouds lead to covalent character. When the electron cloud of the iodide ion is significantly distorted, electrons are effectively shared between aluminum and iodine. This sharing of electrons indicates covalent character in the bond. The greater the distortion, the more covalent the bond becomes.

Covalent character outweighs ionic character due to polarization. The polarizing power of aluminum is strong enough to induce a significant degree of electron sharing with iodine. As a result, the compound exhibits properties more characteristic of covalent compounds than ionic compounds. The induced covalent character dominates the bonding.

How does the structure of Aluminum Iodide provide insight into its bonding?

Molecular structure reflects bonding type. Aluminum iodide (AlI3) exists as a dimer (Al2I6) in the solid state. This dimeric structure suggests covalent rather than ionic bonding. Ionic compounds typically form extended lattice structures.

Dimeric form indicates shared electrons. The dimeric structure of Al2I6 involves bridging iodine atoms between two aluminum atoms. These bridging iodine atoms indicate electron sharing. Electron sharing is a characteristic feature of covalent bonds.

Bridging iodine atoms suggest covalent interactions. In the Al2I6 dimer, each iodine atom is bonded to two aluminum atoms. This bridging arrangement facilitates electron sharing. The shared electrons stabilize the molecule through covalent interactions.

Molecular structure confirms covalent nature. The observed dimeric structure of aluminum iodide. The structure and shared electrons confirm that the bonding is predominantly covalent. The covalent nature arises from the polarizing effects between aluminum and iodine.

So, there you have it! Whether AlCl3 is ionic or covalent isn’t quite so black and white, is it? Hopefully, this has cleared up some of the confusion. Now you can confidently tackle those chemistry questions… or at least impress your friends at your next trivia night!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top